Date Established: 3/1/2010
Date Last Updated: 11/3/2015
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
The University at Buffalo prohibits discrimination and harassment and requires that accommodations be provided to individuals when such accommodations are reasonable and necessary as a result of an individual’s disability, religion, pregnancy, maternity, or breastfeeding status. This policy describes the procedure the university will follow to investigate or resolve complaints of discrimination and harassment.
The University at Buffalo (UB, university) is committed to ensuring equal employment, educational opportunity, and equal access to services, programs, and activities without regard to an individual's race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, gender, pregnancy, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, predisposing genetic characteristics, marital status, familial status, veteran status, military status, domestic violence victim status, or ex-offender status. This includes, but is not limited to, recruitment, the application process, examination and testing, hiring, training, grading, disciplinary actions, rates of pay or other compensation, advancement, classification, transfer and reassignment, discharge, and all other terms and conditions of employment, educational status, and access to university programs and activities. Employees, students, applicants or other members of the university community (including but not limited to vendors, visitors, and guests) may not be subjected to harassment that is prohibited by law or treated adversely based upon a protected characteristic.
The university will provide accommodations to ensure the full participation of individuals in university programs, when such accommodations are reasonable and necessary due to an individual's disability, religion, pregnancy, maternity, or breastfeeding status. The university will provide accommodations to individuals with disabilities in accordance with its Reasonable Accommodation Policy. Religious accommodations will be provided in accordance with the university’s Religious Accommodation and Expression Policy.
This policy prohibits retaliation against anyone who files a complaint, participates in an investigation, or opposes a discriminatory act, practice, or policy. Retaliation will not be tolerated and may result in a referral to the university’s disciplinary process.
The university’s policy is in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination and harassment. These laws include the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as Amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, and the New York State Human Rights Law. These laws prohibit discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment and sexual violence.
An individual bringing forward a complaint of harassment, discrimination, or retaliation, whether on the individual's own behalf or on behalf of another person or group.
Different treatment of an individual or group based upon a factor prohibited by law, including race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, gender, pregnancy, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, predisposing genetic characteristics, marital status, familial status, veteran status, military status, domestic violence victim status, and ex-offender status, that adversely affects the individual’s or group's employment or academic status. Policies or practices that adversely impact a protected group may also constitute discrimination, even when applied in a consistent manner.
Harassment is a form of discrimination. Sex discrimination also includes, but is not limited to sexual harassment, sexual assault, and sexual violence.
Discrimination may also result from failure of the university to provide accommodations to individuals when required due to the individual's disability, religion, pregnancy status, maternity, and/or breastfeeding status.
Conduct that is unwelcome, severe, pervasive, or persistent enough to interfere with an individual's employment, education, or other access to university programs and activities, and that is targeted toward an individual or group based on a protected factor, including race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, gender, pregnancy, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, predisposing genetic characteristics, marital status, familial status, veteran status, military status, domestic violence victim status, and ex-offender status; harassment is a form of discrimination.
Preponderance of the Evidence
The standard of proof in discrimination cases, which determines whether it is “more likely than not” that the discriminatory or harassing act(s) occurred.
An individual or entity against whom a complaint has been filed.
An adverse action taken against an individual as a result of complaining about discrimination or harassment, exercising a legal right such as obtaining a reasonable accommodation, and/or participating in a complaint investigation as a third party witness. Adverse actions may include, but are not limited to: termination/dismissal, failure to promote or assign salary increases, the assignment of lower grades or performance evaluations than other individuals who perform similarly, attempts to intimidate or harass the individual, the assignment of less desirable work to the individual, and/or the provision of negative references with respect to academic work or employment.
Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when:
· submission to or enduring such conduct when rejected is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of instruction, employment, or participation in other university activities or
· submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as a basis for evaluation in making academic or personnel decisions affecting an individual or
· such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive university environment.
Sexual harassment, sexual violence and other forms of sex discrimination are prohibited under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and New York State Human Rights Law. This university definition of sexual harassment is based on Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and Office of Civil Rights (OCR) regulations. Employees who observe or become aware of sexual harassment, sexual violence and other forms of sex discrimination or harassment should report this information to the Director of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI), who also serves as the university’s Title IX Coordinator.
See Appendix A for additional information regarding sexual harassment, and Appendix B for a full explanation of the rights of victims of sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking.
Sexual Harassment Information Advisors
University personnel who have received extensive sexual harassment training, conducted by the Director of EDI or designee, to act as educators and trainers and provide general information on sexual harassment. These individuals may be designated by the president, provost, vice presidents, and/or deans to serve as Sexual Harassment Information Advisors in their respective areas.
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, a federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in any education program or activity that receives federal financial assistance.
EDI is the campus office designated to manage this complaint procedure. EDI will receive complaints, conduct necessary investigations, report findings, and make recommendations in accordance with the procedures outlined below.
The discrimination complaint procedure provides a mechanism through which the university may identify, respond to, prevent, and eliminate incidents of illegal discrimination. It may be used by any person who believes he or she has been the subject of discrimination in connection with UB. If a claim of discrimination or harassment involves a non-UB entity such as a contractor, vendor, or affiliated hospital, UB will coordinate as necessary to ensure that an appropriate investigation is conducted and that discriminatory and/or harassing behaviors are addressed.
Ordinarily, complaints should be filed within one year after the last act of alleged discrimination or harassment occurred. In instances involving a student complaint against a faculty member charging discrimination that occurred in the context of a subordinate-supervisor academic relationship (e.g., teaching, advising, thesis or dissertation supervision, coaching, clinical medical supervision), the time period may be extended until one year after the student is no longer under the faculty member's academic or clinical medical supervision or three years from the date the most recent alleged discrimination occurred, whichever is earlier. Failure to file a complaint within the relevant limitation period may lead to dismissal of the complaint.
Initial Consultation with Complainant
Any member of the UB community may speak confidentially with an EDI representative regarding potential discrimination or harassment. The representative will determine the nature of the issue or concern, obtain relevant facts, and provide guidance as to whether the matter falls under the office's jurisdiction. EDI will maintain a confidential record of the conversation, to the extent allowed by law. If the matter does not fall under EDI's jurisdiction, and/or if there are parallel avenues which the individual could pursue (e.g., academic grievance procedures), information will be provided regarding the university resources available to address the concern. If the matter falls within EDI's jurisdiction and the individual wishes to pursue a complaint, the complainant will be advised of the subsequent steps in the investigatory process.
In cases where the reporting individual wishes to discuss the matter but not proceed with the complaint investigation process, EDI will maintain a confidential record of the conversation, to the extent allowed by law. It should be noted that in instances of harassment, there may be situations where the university is legally obligated to pursue complaint investigation regardless of the individual's willingness to proceed. In this event, the individual will be notified, and steps identified to protect the complainant against retaliation and ensure an acceptable working or learning environment for the complainant. In instances involving allegations of serious misconduct, the matter may be referred to appropriate disciplinary channels for investigation.
Victims of sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking have multiple options for redress, as well as the right to obtain assistance in order to ensure they can continue to participate in university programs and activities. These options and rights are described Appendix B - Student's Bill of Rights.
The complainant will be asked to complete an initial Intake and Information Sheet, and will be provided assistance in completing this form when necessary. Failure or refusal to complete this form will not preclude investigation of the complaint. Individuals may contact EDI anonymously, either for consultation or to file a complaint. It is important to note that due process considerations may limit the ability to investigate or resolve anonymous complaints.
The Investigatory Process
The investigatory process is guided by the need to balance the remedy of unlawful discrimination and harassment with principles of fairness, due process, and confidentiality. Accordingly, parties to a complaint are afforded the following rights and protections:
For complaints that also involve law enforcement proceedings, EDI will comply with law enforcement requests for cooperation, including when such cooperation may require EDI to temporarily suspend the fact-finding aspect of an investigation while the law enforcement agency is in the process of gathering evidence. EDI will resume its investigation as soon as it is notified by the law enforcement agency that it has completed the evidence gathering process.
In conducting a complaint investigation, EDI considers relevant laws, policies and procedures, documentation, and information obtained from the complainant, respondent, and third party witnesses. The standard of proof in complaints made under this policy is preponderance of the evidence. The timeframe for handling a complaint will depend upon the complexity of the investigation, but should not exceed sixty days absent good cause. The following are potential outcomes of a complaint investigation:
The parties to a complaint will receive notice of the outcome of the investigation.
In the event that the investigatory process outlined in this policy may result in a conflict of interest, the university will take necessary measures to ensure that the investigation is thorough and impartial. These measures may include reassignment of the responsibility for the investigation. In the event that EDI cannot conduct an investigation due to a conflict of interest, the university will ensure that the complaint is investigated by individuals with experience and training in discrimination compliance. If EDI is precluded from investigating a complaint, the office may still assist complainants and respondents in seeking a voluntary resolution to the matter, as appropriate.
Complaints against the university’s president will be handled in accordance with the State University of New York (SUNY) Discrimination Complaint Procedure.
If a complainant refuses to cooperate and/or respond to requests for information in a timely manner, EDI will proceed with an investigation based on the information already provided. In the event that this information does not allow for an effective investigation, the complaint will be closed with notice to the complainant.
In the event that a respondent refuses to cooperate and/or respond to requests for an interview or other information, the respondent’s supervisor will issue the respondent a directive to cooperate with the investigation. If the respondent’s supervisor cannot issue such a directive because of a conflict of interest, the respondent will be directed to cooperate by the next individual in the chain of command. Failure to comply with this directive will result in a referral for disciplinary action.
There is no right to appeal an EDI finding. A complainant may file a charge of discrimination with the appropriate state or federal enforcement agencies at any point in the process, subject to applicable time limitations. It is important to note that filing an internal complaint pursuant to the procedure may not extend the time limits established by state and federal enforcement agencies. It is not necessary to pursue university complaint procedures before filing an external complaint.
State and federal enforcement agencies include:
New York State Division of Human Rights
The Walter J. Mahoney State Office Building
65 Court Street, Suite 506
Buffalo, NY 14202
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
6 Fountain Plaza, Suite 350
Buffalo, NY 14202
Office for Civil Rights, New York Office
U.S. Department of Education
32 Old Slip, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10005-2500
|Equity, Diversity and Inclusionemail@example.com|
|November 2015||Updated to add familial status as an additional bias that is protected by law. |
|October 2015||Updated Appendix B to reflect New York State legislation modifying the Students’ Bill of Rights, formerly the Sexual Violence Victim/Survivor Bill of Rights.|
|June 2015||Updated Appendix B to reflect the current SUNY Sexual Violence Victim/Survivor Bill of Rights.|
|June 2014||Updated to comply with a Resolution Agreement between SUNY and the Department of Education Office for Civil Rights. The major changes include the addition of some definitions, clarification of the legal standard for considering complaints, and an expansion of the description of rights available to victims of sexual violence, dating violence, domestic violence, and stalking (captured in the policy and a revised Appendix B). |
|April 2012||Updated procedures pertaining to a potential conflict of interest and added Appendix B regarding sexual violence.|
|November 2011||Updated Office of Equity, Diversity and Affirmative Action (EDAAA) department name to reflect the current name of Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI).|
In determining whether conduct constitutes harassment, consideration will be given to the record as a whole and to the totality of circumstances, including the nature of the sexual advances and the context in which the incidents occurred.
Certain behavior can be classified as sexual harassment even if a relationship appears voluntary in the sense that one was not coerced into participating. A central element in the definition of sexual harassment is that the behavior is unwelcome.
Some acts or practices that have the effect of discouraging individuals of either sex from pursuing academic or professional interests may not constitute sexual harassment because they are not sexual in nature. Such acts may nevertheless constitute illegal sex discrimination if the behavior is directed toward members of one sex and not the other.
Sexual harassment can take different forms, and the determination of what constitutes sexual harassment will vary according to the particular circumstances. Sexual harassment may involve behavior by a person of either sex against a person of the same or opposite sex. Harassment that is sexual in content is always actionable regardless of the harasser’s sex, sexual orientation, or motivations.
Examples of sexual harassment may include but are not limited to:
The first two examples illustrate what is characterized as the "quid pro quo" form of sexual harassment. The third example illustrates the "hostile environment" form of sexual harassment. "Hostile environment" sexual harassment is unwelcome sexual behavior toward another employee or student that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim's employment or academic pursuits and create a work or educational environment that a reasonable person would find abusive. (This explanation of "hostile environment" sexual harassment is based on U.S. Supreme Court decisions (e.g., Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v Vinson 477 U.S. 57, 67 (1986)).
Isolated instances (e.g., a sexual comment or joke), ordinarily will not constitute sexual harassment unless the circumstances are egregious. Such sexual behavior does not constitute harassment if it is welcomed (i.e., voluntary and consensual). It is important to note that conduct in the workplace or educational setting may fall short of the legal standard for sexual harassment but may still be addressed as unprofessional and/or inappropriate.
Student's Bill of Rights
The State University of New York and UB are committed to providing options, support and assistance to victims/survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and/or stalking to ensure that they can continue to participate in university-wide and campus programs, activities, and employment. All victims/survivors of these crimes and violations, regardless of race, color, national origin, religion, creed, age, disability, sex, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, familial status, pregnancy, predisposing genetic characteristics, military status, domestic violence victim status, or criminal conviction, have the following rights, regardless of whether the crime or violation occurs on campus, off campus, or while studying abroad:
All students have the right to:
Victims/survivors have many options that can be pursued simultaneously, including one or more of the following:
Copies of this Bill of Rights shall be distributed annually to students, made available on UB's website, and posted in each campus residence hall, dining hall, and student union or campus center and shall include links or information to access the Sexual Violence Response Policy and the Options for Confidentially Disclosing Sexual Violence.
Revised August 13, 2015