The site visit consists of a set series of business days where two to three external evaluators visit campus and meet with department faculty and staff, graduate and undergraduate students (where applicable), postdocs and clinical faculty (where applicable), the academic dean, the vice provost for faculty affairs and dean of the graduate school and the provost, among others.

The potential external evaluators should fulfill the following criteria:

• Full Professor, preferably from a public, Research I, university.
• Have no significant prior or present connections to the department/program.
• Have not been the mentor or mentee of a faculty member.
• Have not engaged in collaborative research or published with a member of the unit within the previous 10 years.
• Should not have a significant personal or professional relationship with a unit member.

Based on this criteria, the department should compile a list of four to six potential external evaluators, including links to their CV’s and/or bio-sketches) and send them to UBCPR@buffalo.edu. The CPR specialist will then have the list vetted by the appropriate deans. Upon approval or instruction, CATT will notify the department via email.

The site visit dates are up to your department, with approval from the various parties involved, sometime during the assigned semester when students are on campus and all department faculty are present. See the Tentative Review Schedule for information on when your site visit should be scheduled.

The department is responsible for coordinating the travel to and from the airport, hotel and campus and also for escorting the external evaluators in between meetings.

The department may take the external evaluators out to dinner on one, or both, days of the review. All up-front meal costs with the external evaluators (orientation breakfast, provided lunches, dinners with the evaluators) are the responsibility of the department. CATT will work with the departmental designee to arrange access to a departmental program review account. The designee will then work under the guidelines of existing business policies to initiate reimbursement. 

We recommend that all meal and hosting costs not exceed $460 (for two reviewers) or $690 (for three reviewers).

Yes, the department’s self-study should follow the self-study document template. The template contains both graduate and undergraduate content: please omit sections that do not apply to your program/department.

The body of your self-study should be approximately 25-40 pages. The appendices and supporting documents are not included in these page counts. However, reviewers will not go through everything. It is a good idea to keep the appendices and supporting documents focused on the items that help reinforce the story of the self-study.

The self-study should be shared with UBCPR@buffalo.edu in electronic form, no later than five weeks prior to your site visit to allow ample time for the appropriate deans to review the document and changes to be made by the department, where applicable, before sharing with the evaluation team, no later than three weeks prior to the review.

The department is responsible for creating the site visit itinerary. There are two meetings that are scheduled by the CATT office, they are as follows:

• Site Visit Orientation – This half-hour meeting is generally held on the first morning of the visit at 9:00. This meeting will be held within the department, and the department is responsible for booking the room. The attendees of this meeting are the Director of the Office of Curriculum, Assessment and Teaching Transformation, Assistant Vice Provost (CATT), Comprehensive Program Review and Assessment Specialist, and the evaluation team.
• Exit Interview – This one-hour meeting is the last major meeting, scheduled on the final day of the site visit. This meeting generally begins at 1:00 p.m. and is scheduled by the Comprehensive Program Review and Assessment Specialist. The attendees of this meeting are the provost, VPFA,, VPUE (where applicable), academic dean (and/or designee), cognizant associate dean, director of CATT, and the evaluation team.

In addition to the meetings scheduled by CATT, the itinerary should include the following meetings/events:

• Meeting with the Dean/Cognizant Dean: this is a 30-minute meeting with academic dean and cognizant dean on the first day. 
• Meeting with the department chair and/or program director.
• Meeting with the directors of graduate and undergraduate study (where applicable).
• Meeting with the graduate students and undergraduate students (where applicable).
• Meeting with the admissions committee.
• Meeting with any subcommittees.
• Meeting with postdoctoral scholars and/or clinical faculty (where applicable).
• Meeting with the staff.
• An all-faculty meeting.
• A one-hour (minimum) time for the evaluation team to meet alone (the best time for this meeting would be directly before the exit interview on the second day of the visit).

Typically programs are reviewed every five to seven years.

In general, externally accredited programs are not reviewed. Non-accredited programs housed in departments or units where most programs are accredited will still be reviewed.

The departmental designee will book the hotel for the evaluation team, using the hotel of your choice from this list. The individual traveler should book his/her own flight. The departmental designee will reimburse the individual traveler from the assigned departmental program review account for his/her flight after the site visit is over.

Following the conclusion of the site visit, the evaluators will submit their final report within four weeks. Once the report is received, an Action Items meeting will be scheduled with the Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs (VPFA), the Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education (VPUE), as applicable, the department chair, the dean of the department, the Director of CATT, and the Comprehensive Program Review and Assessment Specialist.

Undergoing program review may cause you to reflect on programs you would like to discontinue. Discontinuing a program directly affects curriculum, student success, budget and planning processes. Considering discontinuing a program should be fair, equitable, data-informed, faculty-driven and student focused. The university discontinues a program when it removes the program from the institution’s list of approved programs, but only after current students have an opportunity to complete their program.  Should a program be deemed nonviable, contact Katie Darling for graduate programs and Krista Hanypsiak for undergraduate programs to learn about the process for discontinuation.