“Biological Ties and Biological Accounts of Moral
Status," The Journal of Medicine and
How Not to Defend the Unborn” with David Hershenov,
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, forthcoming.
“How to Gerrymander Intention,” American
Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89:3 (2015): 441-460.
“Artifacts, Intentions, and Contraceptives: The Problem
with Having a Plan B for Plan B,” Journal of Medicine and
Philosophy 38:6 (2013): 657-673.
“Dualism, Panpsychism, and the Moral Status of Brainless
Embryos” with David Hershenov 2016. Ethics, Medicine and
Public Health. Special Issue on Personal Identity and
Bioethics. 2:4, 593– 601.
“Personal Identity and the Possibility of
Autonomy.” With David Hershenov. Dialectica.
“Can Ordinary Materialists be Autonomous?” With
David Hershenov. 2016. Philosophia Christi. 18:2,
“Harm and the Concept of Medical Disorder,”
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics (forthcoming; published
online July 2017, DOI 10.1007/s11017-017-9418-8).
“Comparative Harm, Creation and Death,”
Utilitas 28:2 (2016) 136-163.
“Plural Harm,” Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research 90:2 (2015) 361-388.
“If Abortion then Infanticide.” with David
Hershenov. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics.
“The Potential of Potentiality Arguments” with
David Hershenov in J. Eberl Ed. Contemporary Controversies in
Catholic Bioethics. Springer Press. Forthcoming
“Health, Harm and Potential” with David Hershenov.
Southwest Philosophy Review, 32: 1 January 2016.
“Anscombe on Embryos and Human Beings” in
Anscombe and The Catholic Intellectual Tradition. Neumann
Press. Eds. John Mizzoni, Philip Pegan, Geoffrey Karabin.. 2016.
“Pathocentric Medicine and a Moderate Internal Morality
of Medicine”, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy.
“Health, Interests, and Equality” with Rose
Hershenov, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics.
“Morally Relevant Potential” with Rose Hershenov.
Journal of Medical Ethics, 2015. 41:3. 268-271.
“Death and Dignity.” Anscombe Forum: Human
Dignity. Eds: John Mizzoni, Neumann University Press. 2016. pp.
Taking pleasure in the good and well-being: the harmless
pleasure objection. 2017. Philosophia. (Published online
September 15, 2017.)
“Is presumed consent a morally permissible policy
for organ donation?” Controversies in Catholic
Bioethics, Springer Press. Forthcoming.
Catholicism and the duty to vaccinate. 2017. American
Journal of Bioethics 17(4): 56-57.
Human enhancement and identity-affecting changes: the problem
of controversial cases. 2016. Ethics, Medicine, and Public
Health 2(4): 499-506.
The nonidentity problem and bioethics: a natural law
perspective. 2016. Christian Bioethics 22(2): 122-142.
Therapy, enhancement, and the ethics of business in medicine:
challenges for the doctor-patient relationship and patient safety.
Published online January 29, 2016. (co-authored with David Martin).
Journal of Business Ethics.
You're Probably Not Really a
Speciesist, forthcoming at Pacific
Neurological Disease Ontology Mark Jensen, Alexander P Cox,
Naveed Chaudhry, Marcus Ng, Donat Sule, William Duncan, Patrick
Ray, Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Barry Smith, Alan Ruttenberg, Kinga
Szigeti, Alexander D Diehl 2013/12/6 J. Biomedical Semantics 4
Koch. P, Lazaridis, C. “What does it mean for a
Critically Ill Patient to Fare Well?” Intensive Care
Medicine (2017). doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4819-8
Bruce, C. R. and Koch, P. “Opting out of Bad Texas
Legislation”. Houston Business Journal.
Bruce, C. R. and Koch, P. “Flawed Assumptions: Ethical
Problems with Proposed Presumed Consent Legislation”.
American Journal of Transplantation. Accepted Author
Manuscript. doi:10.1111/ajt.14402. Forthcoming.
Kothari S, Sullivan, LS, Koch, P, and Lazaridis, C.
“Changing the Conversation: A Capabilities Approach to
Disordered Consciousness.” American Journal of Bioethics
Freer. J, Berman, H., Koch, P, and Craenen, G. “Comfort
Care Request for a Pre-Term Infant: A Prescriptive Analysis.”
American Journal of Bioethics. 17(1). 2017.
Stephen Kershnar, “Quantifying Health Across
Populations,” Bioethics 30 (2016): 451-461
Tragic Failures: How and Why We are Harmed by
Carl F. Cranor, Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, UC
Provides a new unified diagnosis of environmental law; Builds its
thesis on recent public health law and important new tort law
decisions; Poses solutions to the many adverse effects of
enironmental legislation on the individual.
What Do Philosophers Do?
Penelope Maddy, Founding Chair,
UC Irvine, Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science
Evaluates a range of philosophical methods: common sense,
scientific naturalism, ordinary language, conceptual analysis, and
therapeutic approaches; presents arguments for radical skepticism
from an everyday point of view.
All Talked Out: Naturalism and the Future of
J.D. Trout, Illinois Institute of Technology
Contains insights into our cognitive limitations that will prove
useful to psychologists and policy makers; Makes a significant
contribution to the literature on the future of philosophy; A novel
approach to conflicts of interest in government.