Release Date: January 16, 2015
BUFFALO, N.Y. –The Supreme Court’s announcement on Friday that it would soon consider whether states are constitutionally required to license same-sex marriages will likely bring marriage equality to the minority of states that still prohibit it, according to Michael Boucai, a University at Buffalo professor who specializes on law and sexuality. The Court will take up the matter in April, and a decision is expected by late June.
Currently same-sex couples can marry in 36 states and the District of Columbia.
“Assuming the court's composition doesn't change in the months ahead, I think we have a pretty good sense what their decision will be,” says Boucai. “All signs point to a ruling in favor of same-sex marriage.”
“In U.S. v. Windsor, where the court struck down a key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act, dissenting Justice Scalia warned that it was only a matter of time before ‘the other shoe’ would drop,” said Boucai. “That time is now upon us.”
Boucai has previously cited the “overwhelming” number of judicial decisions finding a constitutional basis for same-sex marriage since Windsor. “What was once a steady trend is now more like an avalanche,” Boucai said when court after court struck down bans on same-sex marriage.
Boucai has an established record of supporting marriage equality as a legal matter.
“I have always believed that same-sex couples should have the right to marry,” Boucai says. “I have long found certain constitutional arguments in favor of that right to be compelling, as most judges do now.”
His last two research articles also have centered on same-sex marriage. Boucai's most recent scholarship has sought to amplify some of the more disruptive aspects of the increasingly innocuous claim to same-sex marriage. "Glorious Precedents: When Gay Marriage Was Radical," is a study of three same-sex marriage cases brought during the heyday of gay liberation, in the years immediately following the Stonewall riots of 1969. It is forthcoming in the Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. A prior article, “Sexual Liberty and Same-Sex Marriage: An Argument from Bisexuality,” challenged the constitutionality of using marriage law to steer individuals into heterosexual relationships.