Ramanell Center.

The Center for Clinical Ethics and Humanities in Health Care, established at the University at Buffalo in 1994, is now the Romanell Center for Clinical Ethics and the Philosophy of Medicine. The name change honors the 2003 testimentary gift bestowed by Edna Romanell, while reflecting a focus on bioethics in today's complex health care concerns. As a multi-disciplinary center with a long tradition of coordinating academic activities, the Center is poised to expand collaborative research and experience-based learning at UB to better serve the communities of Western New York, Southern Ontario, and borders beyond our own.

Romanell Center Director, David Hershenov, is featured in a video interview hosted by PhilStuff. Hershenov discusses the relationship between personal identity and the ethics of abortion. He addresses questions and topics such as: What is personal identity? Why personal identity? Brain death; Twinning and fusion; Conjoined twins; Brain transplant; Some interesting puzzles; Bias in the bioethics community. See the YouTube video, here.

Jack Freer, Artist

Since retiring from clinical medicine, Jack Freer has been spending more time working on pastel painting. This image depicts a scene in Florence during a 1629-31 outbreak of bubonic plague.

Timmerman's new book: Not to Be: Death, Immortality, and Rational Attitudes

Portrait of Travis Timmerman.

Travis Timmerman, PhD

Oxford University Press will soon publish Travis Timmerman's new book, Not to Be: Death, Immortality, and Rational Attitudes (forthcoming 2027). The description reads, in part: Deprivationists hold that death is prudentially bad insofar as it prevents one from living additional net good life. This book defends a simple version of deprivationism and then explores the relationship between death’s badness and various interrelated questions that deserve more attention. Timmerman begins by defending an account of overall harm that applies to all events, including death. He then shows how deprivationism can be made immune from the problems normally thought to plague it before arguing that it’s superior to its Epicurean, categorical desire, and annihilationist rivals. From there, Timmerman turns to questions about immortality, first offering an intuitive argument for its desirability. He then argues for the extremely counterintuitive conclusion that two infinitely good lives could be equally valuable, even when one contains far more suffering. Timmerman concludes with an extended exploration of the surprising relationship between the overall value of death and how to feel about it. Stay tuned for OUP information on advance ordering.
KEYWORDS: Death; Deprivationism; Epicureanism: Annihilation: Categorical Desires; Immortality; Infinite Ethics; Population Ethics; Procreation Asymmetry; Fitting Attitudes.