By ELLEN GOLDBAUM
Published February 24, 2023
Brain lesions — areas of brain tissue that show damage from injury or disease — are the biomarker most widely used to determine multiple sclerosis disease progression. But an innovative new study led by UB researchers strongly suggests the volume of white matter lesions is neither proportional to, nor indicative of, the degree of severe disability in patients.
The results were reported in a poster session on Feb. 24 at the annual meeting of the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research of Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS) in San Diego.
The study compared two sets of 53 MS patients each, ages 30-80, who had the same gender and disease duration but vast and measurable differences in the extent of their physical and cognitive disabilities.
“The absence of material differences in white matter brain lesion burden means this is not a significant driver of severe disability progression, despite the fact that many MS disease-modifying treatments are focused on slowing accumulation of white matter lesions,” says Robert Zivadinov, principal investigator, professor in the Department of Neurology in the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences and director of UB’s Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center and the Center for Biomedical Imaging in UB’s Clinical and Translational Science Institute.
The results are from a first-of-its kind study led by UB that has begun to investigate why a small percentage of people with MS quickly become severely disabled while in others the disease progresses much more slowly.
The individuals in the severely disabled cohort are residents of The Boston Home in Dorchester, Massachusetts, a specialized residential facility for individuals with advanced progressive neurological disorders including MS.
Each of them was matched with a Buffalo-based “twin” of the same age, sex and disease duration but who experienced far less cognitive and physical disability.
Called Comprehensive Assessment of Severely Affected – Multiple Sclerosis, or CASA-MS, the investigator-initiated, privately funded UB study is focused on identifying biomarkers and cognitive differences among people whose MS disability has become severe compared to others whose disease progresses slowly. More information about how the UB team decided to compare these two populations is available in this UBNow story.
The question of what distinguishes people with severe MS from those who respond well to therapies and continue to live nearly normal lives for decades after diagnosis has confounded patients, caregivers and clinicians for too long, Zivadinov says.
“We couldn’t know what the CASA-MS study would show because no one has done this research previously,” he explains. “What we know now is that the differences between the two groups we studied are striking, and striking in ways that may surprise many of us in this field. I am confident these findings open new doors for both people with severe disabilities, as well as the promise of new insights for the millions more who worry where their disease may take them.”
Despite many available treatments for MS, a subgroup of patients, about 5-10% of the 2.8 million people with MS worldwide, will develop rapid and progressive, and ultimately severe disability at a relatively young age.
It is widely accepted that MS is characterized by the formation of brain white matter lesions. Yet in this study participants with severe MS disability showed significantly more gray matter loss in the cortex and thalamus compared to their less-disabled “twin.” Surprisingly, the loss of whole brain volume was comparable among both groups.
While lesion load in both groups was not materially different, the study revealed other important distinctions between the groups in brain scans and cognitive tests. Severely affected people exhibited lower efficiency in thalamic structural connectivity, meaning they demonstrated lower structural connectivity of the associated brain networks than their less-disabled counterparts.
The study also concluded that members of the severely affected cohort showed more pronounced atrophy of the medulla oblongata — the connection between the brainstem and the spinal cord — which Zivadinov says serves, in this study, as a proxy for spinal cord atrophy.
“These findings suggest that severely disabled MS patients suffer from spinal cord atrophy, an irreversible state of degeneration or loss of spinal cord substance,” he says.
The severely disabled group also showed more advanced loss of neurons. This was revealed by collaborating scientists at the University of Basel, Switzerland, led by Jens Kuhle, professor of neurology, who used special blood-based techniques to study the extent of axonal damage.
The idea to compare two groups of MS patients differentiated by the severity of their disability started with Larry Montani, chair of the BNAC Advisory Council, whose sister, Mary Jo, was a resident at The Boston Home. He urged Zivadinov and members of his research team to travel to Boston and meet the residents.
“You could see the wheels turning as soon as Dr. Zivadinov and his team met the residents of The Boston Home,” Montani recalls. “Dr. Zivadinov’s focus on the patient is what made this possible. His patient-centered approach leads to research that is highly relevant, validated and pursued with an urgency to find answers that offer hope. The CASA-MS study breaks new ground in all these ways for people like my sister, whose vibrant minds and gracious hearts are trapped in a severely disabled body.”
According to co-principal investigator Ralph H. Benedict, professor of neurology in the Jacobs School and a collaborator on the study, CASA-MS points to the value of new hypotheses and research focused on a better understanding of people with severe MS disability.
“Clinical trials exploring disease progression are likely to emerge from this unusual examination of this rarely studied population,” Benedict says. “There is so much more to learn, and I can’t imagine a more deserving community of ready and willing study participants.”
Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, SUNY Distinguished Professor in the Department of Neurology and co-principal investigator, notes the study strongly suggests significant opportunities for more sophisticated MRI scanning.
“This study showed that novel 7T and PET scanning — techniques deployed specifically for this severely disabled patient population — may provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of severe MS,” she says.
Boston Home chief executive officer Christine Reilly says that for most of the volunteers, “participation in this study took extraordinary effort and patience, but they never hesitated. What we found so touching and revealing was that so many of the participants from each cohort wanted very much to meet their ‘twin’ — the person from the other cohort of the same age, sex and disease duration — whose MS experience is so dramatically different. The sheer humanity of that desire to connect is truly amazing.”
Other co-investigators in the Department of Neurology are Dejan Jakimovski, research assistant professor; Niels Bergsland, assistant professor; Svetlana Eckert, clinical assistant professor; and David Hojnacki, associate professor. Other UB collaborators are Michael G. Dwyer III, associate professor of neurology and bioinformatics; Ferdinand Schweser, associate professor of neurology and biomedical engineering; Zachary Weinstock, PhD candidate; and Taylor Wicks, master’s candidate in the Jacobs School and BNAC. Murali Ramanathan, professor of pharmaceutical sciences in the School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, is also a co-investigator.
UB research fellow Tommaso Sciortino, Christopher Suchan, Jessica Reilly, Cheryl Kennedy and David Young-Hong are additional collaborators.
The Boston Home collaborators are Alex Burnham, director, TBH institute and rehabilitation services, and Mark Ostrem, medical director.
Partial funding for this study was provided by the Annette Funicello Research Fund for Neurological Diseases and private donations to the BNAC in the Jacobs School. Contributions can be made at BNAC.net.