Published September 18, 2020
Many of the characteristics related to auditory attention in birds match those of humans, according to a new UB study.
The findings, published in the journal PLOS ONE, provide novel insights into evolutionary survival mechanisms, and are the first to behaviorally measure the cognitive process responsible for a non-human animal’s ability to segregate and respond to meaningful targets heard in simultaneous sound streams.
Though previous research had explored auditory attention in animals, the experiments were clouded by anthropomorphism, which essentially put the cart before the horse, according to Micheal Dent, a professor of psychology in the College of Arts and Sciences, and lead author of the paper co-written with then-UB graduate student Huaizhen Cai, currently a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Pennsylvania.
“People have been doing physiological experiments to find neural correlates to attention capture, but I always thought they did it backwards, since at the time there was no evidence that animals have the same attention characteristics and limits that humans possess,” says Dent. “When you look for physiological correlates to something, you need to know first that the behavior exists.
“We didn’t know it existed then, but now we do.”
Auditory attention is the ability to focus on specific sounds. Attention capture is the involuntary response to sound targets in the environment. For humans, auditory attention can mean having a conversation in a noisy room, but still recognizing and responding (attention capture) to hearing a name being called from a distance.
But what amounts largely to social utility for humans becomes a matter of survival for birds.
“For animals trying to hone in on something in the environment, it’s critical that they respond to something like a big crash in a bush, which could signal the presence of a predator, but not a little one, which can likely be ignored,” explains Dent. “No one had ever measured this before in the auditory domain. They had measured it in the visual system, but never with sound.”
As it turns out, auditory attention in birds is nearly as keen as it is in humans.
But testing auditory attention in animals is challenging given the difficulty of building a paradigm where animals have to ignore specific elements. For humans, the research method is straightforward: tell participants to pay attention to changes in one sound stream, but ignore changes in a different stream.
So to conduct their experiments, Dent and Cai trained seven adult budgerigars to peck a key that started a stream of tones, AAAA, for example. When one tone’s pitch in the sequence changed (AABA) the birds would peck another key.
The researchers then slowly introduced a background stream of tones the birds were supposed to ignore (CCCC), which they did, just as humans would ignore surrounding chatter and noise happening during a phone conversation.
What the birds had trouble ignoring was a frequency change to the background tones (CDCC), similar to the loud crash in the bush, a task also challenging to humans, according to Dent, an expert in the perception of complex auditory stimuli in birds and mammals.
Other factors that affected the birds’ attention were the saliency of the changes in the distractor. Bigger frequency changes in the background disrupted attention to the targets more so than smaller frequency changes. Also, the longer the birds listened to the background they were supposed to be ignoring, the easier it was for them to notice changes in the target streams.
“Just like humans trying to pay attention to something, the longer they hone in on those sounds, the easier it is to ignore the background,” says Dent.
She says she’s currently involved in research to test her hypothesis with more ecologically relevant sounds.
“We have results that demonstrate how the birds respond to pure tones, but are they equally proficient with bird calls?” Dent asks. “That’s what we’re testing next.”