This article is from the archives of the UB Reporter.
News

New institute to analyze shale
as energy resource

  • “We’re really trying to provide fact-based, objective information. We’re guided by science.”

    John P. Martin
    Director, Shale Resources and Society Institute
By JOHN DELLACONTRADA
Published: April 9, 2012

A new Shale Resources and Society Institute based in the Department of Geology, College of Arts and Sciences, will serve as a resource to help the public, policymakers and other stakeholders understand shale’s potential as an energy resource.

The goal of the institute is to provide accurate, research-based information on the development of shale and other unconventional resources, says John P. Martin, the institute’s director.

Specifically, the institute will conduct and disseminate peer-reviewed research that can help guide policymakers on issues relating to hydraulic fracturing and the development of energy resources. The institute will also educate students and provide the public with accurate information.

The institute’s work will draw on the expertise and perspectives of external research partners and UB faculty members in disciplines ranging from engineering to law and the social sciences. Activities will focus on four areas relating to shale development: fractures, fluids and migration; groundwater and surface environmental impacts; societal impacts; and policy and regulation.

“We’re really trying to provide fact-based, objective information,” Martin says. “We’re guided by science.”

“Many people in New York State have a strong opinion on this issue,” says Robert Jacobi, the center’s co-director and a longtime UB professor of geology. “We want to become a valuable community resource where anyone can come and read about current research, outreach and education, and have a feeling that they can trust these data.”

Martin said the institute plans to seek funding from sources including industry and individuals, as well as agencies that support scientific research relating to energy. Future plans include establishing a management committee for the institute that includes the voices of environmental organizations and other stakeholders.

In addition to serving as director of the Shale Resources and Society Institute, Martin is the founder and principal consultant of JPMartin Energy Strategy LLC, which provides strategic planning, resource evaluation and other services to the energy industry, academic institutions and governments.

Prior to forming the consultancy in 2011, Martin spent 17 years working on energy research and policy issues at the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) and developed a series of projects targeting oil and gas resources, renewable energy development and environmental mitigation. He holds a PhD in urban and environmental studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Jacobi, a field and lab geoscientist, has extensive experience in academia and industry. A member of UB’s faculty since 1980, he has over 30 years of experience teaching the structure, tectonics and evolution of North America, marine geology and geophysics, sedimentology and stratigraphy.

His present research focus includes identifying, understanding and predicting the trends of faults, fractures and folds in black shales. In addition to his work at UB, Jacobi is senior geology advisor for EQT Production, a Pittsburgh-based energy company. He recently consulted for the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation concerning hydraulic fracturing, with respect to faults and potential seismic activity. He holds a PhD in geology from Columbia University.

Reader Comments

Sue Tannehill says:

How will this university and the people doing the research here at UB distance themselves from the money being poured into acceptance and encouragement of hydraulic fracturing by energy and gas corporations?

How can you be an academic with integrity when your funding may come from the various organizations whose work may NOT be supported by your research? Is there enough courage in this group to publish negative findings if they are discovered, or, will the temptation to "torture the data until it confesses" be too great?

I am in no way casting aspersions on the integrity of these researchers. I am simply expressing a strong concern.

This is not a neutral research issue and I am deeply concerned that the opportunities to overlook problems and support big money will be too tempting.

Posted by Sue Tannehill, adjunct, 04/09/12