Reaching Others University at Buffalo - The State University of New York
Skip to Content

The Academic Strategy

An academic strategy is an expression of chosen academic directions – for curriculum, for pedagogy, for investments in specific research interests, and for a scholarship of engagement.

This strategy must also encompass consideration of changes in enrollment size, mix by program, by level, by geographic origin that may be necessary or desirable based upon curricular or pedagogical directions. The manner in which we plan for students to distribute across our program offerings is an important expression of our academic character. And, finally the academic strategy is enabled by the choices we will make in the hiring and replacement of faculty by rank, by program, by type – ladder, and non-tenure track (clinical, instructors, adjuncts).

Over the past few months, a new strategic concept is emerging within the university community that may combine the best features of the very successful Strategic Strength Initiative and the Undergraduate Academies program with new notions for the purpose of interdisciplinary teaching, research and service.

This is the concept of the theme as a large scale interdisciplinary framework that integrates cross-disciplinary research, teaching and engagement programs around the content of a broad thematic area. Where the Strategic Strength areas focus on building research strength in particular areas and the Undergraduate Academies focus on supplementary learning experiences, a chosen theme, for example, Health, would be very broad, enabling participation from many Schools and departments in research, education and service activities conducted under that umbrella.

The chosen theme areas would distinguish UB’s academic strategy in the originality of this concept, the integration of the teaching, research and service effort, the creation of new pedagogical innovations and in the signaling to the larger academic world where UB intends to be global thought leaders around the world in these areas. The theme concept, properly advertised, supported and embraced will differentiate UB from other universities and will attract good students intrigued by our emphasis in these areas.

The notion of the theme as the organizing framework for UB’s academic strategy must be tested, structured and discussed carefully within our university community in the months ahead.  We will articulate the purpose and element of the theme concept and develop funding plans and governance structures that will enable the theme idea to fulfill its intended purposes fairly quickly. Most importantly, we must determine what themes we will choose to guide our plans.

The choice of theme areas could be a time consuming process or it could be done very quickly. The important considerations are the following:

TABLE 4

CHOOSING THEMES

Key Considerations

  • An area broad enough to recognize multiple disciplines – all units should be able to imagine their contribution in building the theme area.
  • The chosen themes should together cover the range of disciplinary spectrum from the sciences to the arts and humanities and point the university towards addressing societal needs and problems.
  • There should be a limited number of themes identified at the outset with the potential for more in the future based on the experience with this framework.
  • The chosen theme areas should be a natural extension from the Strategic Strengths and Undergraduate Academies initiatives.
   

When considering all of these factors with particular emphasis on where the Strategic Strengths have led us and what our region and our ambitions tell us about where to focus, four theme areas have emerged as the best choices for our future.

TABLE 5

UB THEMES

  • Health – the state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. The broad examination of promoting health, preventing disease and disability, and treating disease and disability.
  • The Environment – the broad examination of the ways we preserve, sustain and improve all aspects of our environment from the preservation of natural resources to energy management and new sources, to mitigating or recovering from natural disasters to new technologies that reduce risk of future environmental degradation and strengthen commitment to climate action plans that will sustain our quality of life in the future.
  • Creativity – the broad encouragement of the expression of the creative instinct, the study of creativity, the development and proliferation of cultural technologies, the nurturing and the uses of creativity and innovation across the disciplines and to solve regional and world problems.
  • Justice – the exploration of how humans organize their societies, the cultures that develop and the principles of equity that underlie sustainable human endeavors.
   

Each of the Strategic Strength areas will contribute to the development of one or more of these theme areas. Table 6 below identifies the obvious primary connections but it is likely that the strength areas will connect to each of these broad themes in exciting ways.

TABLE 6

THEMES AND STRATEGIC STRENGTHS

   

We are in the midst of the creation of an Academic Medical Center in downtown Buffalo. Western New York is endowed with an abundance of water resources that must be protected and used in new ways for the region and beyond in our soon-to-be challenged future.

UB and Western New York have made a great investment in the theater, the arts, the humanities, in cultural expression, and these investments have built a lasting and impactful cultural infrastructure in our region.  Governance, equity and how cultures express and accept differences lie at the heart of social issues, wars, labor relations, and economic instability locally and around the world.

Thus, it becomes self-evident that organizing themes centered in health, the environment, creativity and justice are consistent with UB’s and the region’s history, strength and uniqueness.  Accordingly, we are proposing to move forward aggressively with these four themes and evaluate this decision on a continuous basis as this concept and the plans for these areas mature.

The theme concept is one of two core elements of the academic strategy. The second core element is the definition of the characteristics we will instill in every UB student. UB will train tomorrow’s leaders, a new kind of leader who thinks for themselves, who can formulate new directions for a country, a corporation, a college of a community; leaders who have vision.

These students can focus rather than let themselves be dispersed everywhere into a cloud of electronic and social input. UB will give these students the experiences and the guidance to find their authentic selves, their own unique reality. Students will leave UB with the specific character traits listed below and they will know and remember the many encounters at UB that produced them.

TABLE 7

DISTINCTIVE TRAITS OF THE FUTURE UB GRADUATE

  •  Exhibit deep domain knowledge while being able to collaborate in solving complex problems
  • Acquire and apply knowledge for a constantly evolving world
  • Express a literacy and an appreciation of many cultures  and the ability to navigate the world
  • Demonstrate excellent communication skills
  • Manifest excellent information and digital literacy
  • Understand their unique personal growth while at UB and the next steps in that path
  • Commit to engage in the affairs of their communities
  • Exude pride in their alma mater and in all endeavors they pursue
   

Below presented is a matrix that describes the objectives and initiatives of UB’s proposed academic strategy. This matrix contains proposals that will, when viewed together, present a very extensive agenda.

We will engage in robust conversation about all of these topics to learn about what is possible and what will be our priorities for action. We will find the capacity to do more if we challenge ourselves. But, in the end, we must define an implementable academic strategy and move forward. 

The Academic Strategy Matrix

POTENTIAL OBJECTIVE

POTENTIAL INITIATIVES/ACTIONS

QUESTIONS

1.     What are the features required in a new UB curriculum for all degree programs that instill the characteristics we expect future UB graduates to exhibit?

 

(Goals I and II)

  • Define the new and distinguishing features of this UB curriculum (by degree program)
    • Theme-based content
    • General education core
    • Mandatory freshman seminar
    • Mandatory capstone
    • Mandatory service learning
    • Inter-professional core
    • International experiences
    • Pedagogical innovations (e.g. flipped classroom, etc.)
  • Develop methods for learning outcomes assessment across all degree areas.
  • Create a “think-tank” and resource fund for creation of pedagogical innovation.
  • Can UB move to a national leadership role in delivering high-quality innovative pedagogy?
  • What is required to implement systematic learning assessment?
  • Who administers the pedagogical innovation “think-tank”?
  • Can the new UB curriculum be aligned with SUNY transferability standards and the demands of professional accreditation agencies?

2.     What is the theme-based research and scholarship agenda that will enable UB to become an international thought leader?

 

(Goals I, III, and IV)

  • Identify theme-based targets and goals for funded research growth that focus on:
    • Multi investigator opportunities
    • National center grants
    • Expanded federal market share in all agencies
    • Expanded corporate and private source funding.
    • Identify theme-based growth areas in non-STEM fields.
    • Identify theme-based university growth areas in engagement scholarship.
  • Will the proposed theme-based target areas be broad and deep enough to position UB as a thought leader in these areas?

 

3.     Should UB’s 5-year enrollment plan be more responsive to demand and workforce needs?

 

(Goals I and II)

  • Examine 5, 10 and 15 year workforce needs projections.
  • Complete longitudinal study of application acceptance and enrollment yield across all existing degree programs.
  • Examine demographic trends in strong, weak, and target markets-out-of-state and international locales as well as in-state.
  • Create an enrollment proposal that maximizes response to demand and career opportunities.
  • Is there an upper limit not to exceed for out-of-state and international enrollment levels?
  • Will/should base resources be redistributed based on shifts in enrollment mix across programs?
  • Is there a limit to possible enrollment redistribution?

4.     What should be the size and mix of faculty by program rank and type to achieve the educational, research, scholarship and engagement needs of the new UB academic plan?

 

(Goals I, II, III, and IV)

  • Identify required teaching needs for each program consistent with their expected contribution to the enrollment plan.
  • Identify the faculty capacity required in the research and scholarship agenda to achieve target goals.
  • Identify the balance of ladder faculty and non-ladder faculty (not adjuncts) required to meet each program’s teaching, research and service obligations.
  • Review and adjust promotion and tenure policies as necessary.
  • Is the concept of the “triple-threat” department with a greater mix of clinical, teaching and research faculty a workable concept?
  • Is the concept of a “teaching” faculty a workable concept?
  • How will tenure, compensation and workload policies be modified if the triple threat and teaching faculty concepts are viable?

5.     Should UB reinvigorate its commitment to serving life-long learning needs of the region with a more expanded and diverse menu of course, degree and certificate program options?  

 

(Goals I and III)

  • Conduct market assessment and best practices review.
  • Determine content priorities and new innovations in program structure and pedagogy.
  • Identify and address legal and organizational structures to best enable success.
  • Is a robust commitment to the life-long learning agenda consistent with UB’s mission and vision?
  • Would participation in a SUNY regional consortium be a better step to take than attempting to organize a much greater stand-alone campus effort?