|
By LOIS BAKER Contributing Editor
Obese intensive care patients do not have a higher ICU death rate
than non-obese ICU patients, but they remain in the ICU significantly
longer and are intubated significantly longer than non-obese patients, a
new study has found. The data emerged from a meta-analysis of 14
studies of obese and non-obese ICU patients carried out by UB
researchers. The analysis included studies that were conducted
in the U.S., Europe, Australia and the Middle East between 2000 and
2007. “This meta-analysis suggests that although mild and
moderate obesity may be protective during critical illness, morbid
obesity did not have an adverse effect on outcome in the ICU,”
said Morohunfolu E. Akinnusi, first author on the study.
“However, obese patients do have increased morbidity as
measured by duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay. As
the waistline of the U.S. population continues to expand, longer lengths
of stay might have significant implications for health care
costs,” he said. Results of the study appeared in the
January 2008 issue of Critical Care Medicine. Akinnusi is a
pulmonary and critical care fellow and a clinical assistant instructor
of internal medicine in the School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences.
The analysis included descriptive and outcome data for 62,045
patients, 15,347 of whom were considered obese, with a body mass index
(BMI) equal to or greater than 30. BMI is a measure of body fat based on
height and weight. A BMI of 18.5-24.9 is considered normal, 25-29.9
overweight and 30 or greater is considered obese. While not
all studies included all of the study endpoints, all 14 contained data
on survival. Those results showed no difference in survival rates
between obese and non-obese patients while they were in the ICU, but the
obese had a slightly higher survival rate at hospital discharge.
Six studies included data on duration of mechanical ventilation. The
number of days obese patients were on a ventilator ranged from 5.2-16
days, while the range for non-obese patients was 4.6-9.4 days, which
resulted in a mean difference of 1.48 days. Thirteen studies
were included in the ICU length-of-stay analysis. Days in the ICU ranged
from 2.1-19.4 in the obese and 2.6-12 days in the non-obese, for a mean
difference of 1.08 days. Akinnusi ventured two possible
explanations for the better survival rates among the obese ICU patients.
“Access to abundant body fat when tissue is breaking down during
illness may help to prevent the long-term complications associated with
critical illness, such as muscle fiber atrophy,” he said.
“There is no clinical data to support this,” Akinnusi
continued, “but there is increasing evidence that hormones
secreted by fat cells, such as leptin and interleukin-10, might curb the
inflammatory response and improve patient survival in response to severe
illness. This is well demonstrated in animal studies.” He
noted also that because of earlier reports that obese patients had worse
survival rates than non-obese patients, caregivers may be paying closer
attention to these patients. In addition, better management of glucose
levels and bloodstream infections may contribute to a significant
decline in ICU complications in obese versus non-obese patients, he
said. “While indiscriminate excessive weight gain is by no
means encouraged,” Akinnusi said, “the findings of the study
should help facilitate reversal of nihilism toward critically ill obese
patients. Potentially beneficial biological characteristics that may be
peculiar to the obesity genotype should be explored for future clinical
applications. “This analysis shows that outcomes of
critically ill, morbidly obese patients are not as bleak as originally
thought,” noted Ali A. El Solh, senior author on the study.
“Further studies are needed to improve morbidity in this
population.” El Solh is an associate professor of medicine
in the UB medical school and also is affiliated with the Department of
Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Health
Professions. Lilibeth A. Pineda, UB assistant professor of medicine,
also contributed to the study.
|