Child Feces: The Neglected Waste

DrainOrToilet, AshleyWheaton, 2009, CC2.0, Modified.

DrainOrToilet, AshleyWheaton, 2009, CC2.0, Modified

Bu Zuwena Plata

Published November 9, 2015

In an effort to reduce open defecation in low- and middle-income countries, there has been a focus on increasing latrine coverage and, more recently, motivating people to use them. 

“The perception is that children’s feces are less offensive and less harmful than those of adults, particularly for children that have not begun eating solid foods. ”
Zuwena Plata, UB Alumna
Epidemiology and Environmental Health

Frequently, adults and older children use latrines, while younger children are allowed to defecate in the open. These defecation sites include ground in the yard or compound, designated fields, and dirt floors inside homes. When children defecate near the home, feces may be buried, discarded in ditches or fields, disposed in toilets or latrines, or left to decompose.

The perception is that children’s feces are less offensive and less harmful than those of adults, particularly for children that have not begun eating solid foods. Although this attitude is common in a number of countries, child feces are as much a health risk, or riskier, than adult feces due to the increased presence of pathogens. It is important, therefore, that research and interventions used to decrease open defecation include a two-pronged approach: (1) designing and constructing latrines that are accessible to children and (2) stressing the importance, among caregivers, about disposal of child feces.

Barriers that keep children from using available latrines include inconvenient latrine locations, poor cleanliness, such as the presence of flies and odor, and the perception that latrines are dangerous, e.g., the potential for children to fall into the latrines. As many of these barriers are similar to those that keep older children and adults from using latrines, addressing these issues for children may have a wider impact on latrine usage.

Physical and social interventions also need to be developed for children in the early phases of toilet training. In Peru, for example, child potties are considered ideal, but toilet training is generally inconsistent, resulting in children defecating openly. Joint efforts that focus on safe child feces disposal and accessible latrines for people with disabilities, older adults, and adolescent girls may gain added traction. As with other water, sanitation, and hygiene efforts, community participation throughout the information-gathering, design, implementation, and assessment process is key, as geographic and cultural factors have a large influence on child-rearing practices, especially toileting.


Feachem RG, Bradley DJ, Garrelick H, Mara DD. Sanitation and Disease: Health Aspects of Excreta and Wastewater Management. World Bank Studies in Water Supply and Sanitation 3. p. 46, 1983.

Majorin F, Freeman MC, Barnard S, Routray P, Boisson S, Clasen T.  Child feces disposal practices in rural Orissa: a cross-sectional study. PLOS One2014. 9(2):e89551.

Sultana R, Mondal UK, Rimi NA, Unicomb L, Winch PJ, Nahar N, Luby SP. An improved tool for household faeces management in rural Bangladeshi communities. Trop Med Int Health 2013 18(7):854-60.

Wandera J, Tsegaye Z, Tamiru S, Getachew F, Kitaba A. The tragedy in school latrine conditions and use: a wake up call for clear responsibility and accountability. SNV Case Studies 2009. 2009

Xuan LT, Hoat LN, Rheinlander T, Dalsgaard A, Konradsen F. Sanitation behavior among school children in a multi-ethnic area of Northern rural Vietnam. BMC Public Health 2012 12:140.

Yeager BAC, Huttly SRA, Bartolini R, Rojas M, Lanata CF. Defecation practices of young children in a Peruvian shanty town. Soc Sci Med 1999 49:531-41.