These questions were developed by UB's Committee for University-Wide Course Evaluations based on a two-year multi-disciplinary research effort.
Overall, this course was: (Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good or Excellent)
Please rate your agreement with each of the following statements about this course:*
Please comment on the elements of the course you found particularly effective. (Qualitative)
Please comment on course improvements you would suggest. (Qualitative)
Overall, this instructor was: (Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent or Not applicable)
Please rate your agreement with each of the following statements about the instructor:*
Please comment on how effective the instructor was in teaching this course. (Qualitative)
Please rate your agreement with the following statements:*
Please rate your agreement with the following statements:*
*Quantitative question with a 5-point Likert scale: (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Any answer with a selection of 1 or 2 are followed up with the qualitative question asking for an explanation of the dissatisfaction.
In light of recent email phishing attempts purporting to be from UB Course Evaluations, we would like to remind everyone that official UBCE correspondence will come from Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Graham Hammill. For more information on reporting phishing attempts, please visit the UBIT website.