This article is from the archives of the UB Reporter.
News

Mapping changing vegetation in Yosemite

With climate change threatening to encourage earlier melting in the Sierra Nevada, groundwater levels at Tuolumne Meadows could rise or fall enough to influence vegetation patterns.

  • “Our work confirms what John Muir wrote back in 1911 about his journey through Yosemite, which is, ‘When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the universe.’”

    Chris Lowry
    Assistant Professor of Geology
By CHARLOTTE HSU
Published: October 10, 2011

Researchers from three universities have partnered to create a new, high-tech tool for mapping changing plant patterns at Tuolumne Meadows, a mountain meadow in Yosemite National Park.

The tool is a model that stitches together years of data from the study area, including meteorological observations, stream-gage measurements, water levels at 55 wells and vegetation surveys that the National Park Service conducted at 222 locations.

By combining these and other factors, the model successfully simulated how past groundwater levels influenced the type of plants growing in the meadow.

A paper describing the new model, which generates “probabilistic vegetation maps,” was published online last month in the journal Water Resources Research.

The next step is to use the model to predict how future climate change could affect vegetation patterns and to test the effectiveness of potential, future restoration strategies.

“Our work confirms what John Muir wrote back in 1911 about his journey through Yosemite, which is, ‘When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the universe,’” says Chris Lowry, UB assistant professor of geology who led the study.

“Our results showed that the distribution of vegetation in Tuolumne Meadows is controlled by cascading hydrologic flows, starting with rain and snow, and moving through the watershed to the meadow and finally discharging to the stream,” Lowry says. “Each of these elements—climate, hillslope, riparian zone and stream—contributes to the distribution of water within Tuolumne Meadows and as a result controls the type of vegetation within the meadow.”

Lowry’s partners on the project include Steven Loheide II of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Courtney Moore and Jessica Lundquist of the University of Washington-Seattle. The research is part of a larger study on mountain meadow restoration in a changing climate that the University of Wisconsin and University of Washington are heading. A National Science Foundation grant supports that work.

The reason groundwater levels are so important in determining meadow vegetation patterns is because different plants have evolved to flourish in different environments.

Where the water table is low, drought-tolerant species dominate because of their superior skills in acquiring and conserving water.

Where the water table is high, in contrast, plants that flourish are those whose internal machinery enables them to survive under wet conditions. These include species that have developed something called an “aerenchyma”—a spongy tissue that allows for exchange of gases between root and shoot, enabling a plant’s roots to “breathe” even when limited air is directly available.

With climate change threatening to reduce snowpack and encourage earlier melting in the Sierra Nevada, groundwater levels at Tuolumne Meadows and other parts of Yosemite could rise or fall enough to influence vegetation patterns.

In the face of such changes, predictive modeling could “save time and financial resources by identifying both meadows that will be most affected by climate change, as well as restoration techniques most suitable to maintain or enhance ecological function,” Lowry and his colleagues wrote in their paper.