News
Activists challenge gender violence in Pakistan.
Comments (1)
News
Grant to help improve alternative communication
-
Print -
Comments
-
“These technologies change the lives of individuals who use them, enabling greater independence and many more opportunities to participate in society.”
Related links
The Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center for Communication Enhancement (AAC-RERC), a partnership involving UB, Duke University and other research institutions, has been awarded a $4.75 million grant by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR).
The grant will extend through September 2013 the center’s work on technologies that enhance communication for 3.5 million Americans whose significant communication disabilities mean they cannot rely on their natural speech to converse.
Among those individuals are children and adults with impairments caused by cerebral palsy, autism, stroke, cancer, Lou Gehrig’s disease, multiple sclerosis, dementia and traumatic brain injury.
The AAC-RERC conducts a comprehensive program of research, development, training and dissemination activities that address NIDRR priorities to improve and promote augmentative and alternative communication technologies.
It is the third five-year award received by the center, which includes researchers from the UB Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences; Duke University Medical Center; Children’s Hospital, Boston; InvoTek Inc.; Oregon Health and Sciences University; Penn State University; and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
At UB, the project is headed by Jeff Higginbotham, professor of communicative disorders and sciences and director of the Communication and Assistive Device Laboratory. UB’s share of the grant ($602,000) will be used to support research and development on a variety of AAC technologies.
One project aims to enhance use of Internet-based devices for speaking and writing by developing topic-related vocabulary for communication, allowing users greater independence and many more opportunities to participate in society.
UB researchers also are developing new augmentative communication technologies that support face-to-face communication by accommodating the subtle physical and cognitive needs of individual users.
Higginbotham points out that users require portability so they are not tied to their home computers. Some users might not be able to touch a screen directly with their hands, so other “pointing” methods need to be devised. Still others may communicate through the use of linked visual images instead of words. The innovations are as varied as the needs of users.
“I am really excited to receive this award again,” he says. “It allows me to continue my research-and-development efforts in the areas of communication performance and augmentative communication devices. These technologies change the lives of individuals who use them, enabling greater independence and many more opportunities to participate in society.
“Our collective research efforts have improved the technologies for individuals with complex communication needs and has advanced the science in our field,” adds Higginbotham, who notes that many significant developments in the field of augmentative and assistive communication are the direct result of work conducted by researchers in the AAC-RERC.
Post a Comment
Comments from current UB faculty, staff and students will be published directly on this page after a brief editorial review process. You will be asked to sign in with your UBITname and password after clicking “Post.” You may not be asked to sign in again if you have already signed in to other UB services (e.g. MyUB, webmail, etc.). The UB Reporter does not publish anonymous comments nor comments posted under a pseudonym. Comments are limited to 125 words; those needing more space to make their point should write a letter to the editor, rather than posting multiple comments. The UB Reporter editor reserves the right not to publish comments that, in the opinion of the editor, make substantially the same point the writer has made in a previous post and do not add anything new to the public discussion of the matter at hand. Please send letters and general comments to the editor using our feedback page.
Reader Comments