VOLUME 33, NUMBER 10 THURSDAY, November 8, 2001
ReporterFront_Page

UB revises exam schedule for spring
Beginning exams right after last day of classes will bring semester in line with law

send this article to a friend

By SUE WUETCHER
Reporter Editor

The university will eliminate reading days and hold final exams on the weekend so that the Spring 2002 semester conforms to state education law.

Calling the calendar snafu "less than a fiasco but more than an irritation," Kerry Grant, vice provost for academic affairs and dean of the graduate school, told members of the Faculty Senate Executive Committee on Oct. 31 that manipulating the exam schedule is the best solution to the problem.

The schedule for the Spring 2002 semester as originally drawn up by the old university-wide Calendar Committee was only 14 weeks long, inclusive of exams, and failed to meet the 15 weeks required by the state. In addition, it also failed to meet the 45 credit hours required by the state.
 
  Achieving an average attendance of 15,000 in UB Stadium may be the inly one of six proposed NCAA criteria that UB may have trouble reaching.
  Photo: Frank Miller
   

Morever, there were instructional problems with the calendar—"faculty in the classroom reported difficulties," he said.

The abbreviated spring semester resulted because Jan. 1 falls on a Tuesday and pushes the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday—set for the third Monday in January—back a week, noted William Baumer, professor of philosophy who, along with Charles Fourtner, professor of biological sciences, assisted Grant in revising the calendar. The spring semester traditionally has started on the Tuesday after the King holiday.

Starting exams immediately after the last day of classes on Friday, May 3, will "yield the necessary 15 instructional weeks," said Grant, who was named "calendar maven" when President William R. Greiner disbanded the Calendar Committee and moved responsibility for the academic calendar into the Provost's Office. The revised calendar also brings the number of credit hours to 44, one short of the state requirement, but close enough as not to attract any attention, he said. "It's the preferred choice among less-than-ideal solutions."

He noted that beginning the semester a week early—on Jan. 14, rather than Jan. 22—would require opening residence halls and other facilities to the tune of $200,000-$250,000, an additional cost that had not been anticipated. And extending the semester by a week in May also would incur additional costs associated with keeping facilities open another week, as well as interfering with commencement, work and research plans, he added.

Manipulating the exam schedule produces "the calendar of least harm," Grant said, pointing out that notifying students in November that there will be no reading days in May should give them ample time to schedule study time.

Grant said he will begin tackling a revision of the Spring calendar for future years—UB will face the same situation in Spring 2003 as it does in Spring 2002.

Baumer pointed out that the King holiday pushes into the fourth week of January in any year that New Year Day falls on Tuesday or Wednesday when the preceding year is a leap year. This year, with New Year's Day falling on Monday, the King holiday was Jan. 15 and fell during the third week of the month. In 2003, New Year's Day will fall on Wednesday, again pushing the King holiday, set for Jan. 21, into the fourth week of the month.

Grant said that starting the spring semester a week earlier than usual likely will be the solution in coming years.

In other business, the FSEC heard a presentation on athletics from Robert Arkeilpane, director of athletics. Arkeilpane briefed senators on the NCAA Division I certification process that UB currently is going through.

Arkeilpane likened the certification process to the Middle States accreditation review that the UB academic program also is undergoing.

All Division I programs undergo the certification process every 10 years, he said, calling it a "very high-profile, institution-wide effort."

Barbara Ricotta, associate vice president for student affairs and dean of students, chairs the steering committee, he said, adding that there are four subcommittees looking at fiscal integrity, academic integrity, governance and rules compliance, and equity, welfare and sportsmanship.

The process offers a "tremendous opportunity for us to take a good hard look at our program, identify areas where deficiencies exist, and gives us an opportunity to address those and correct them accordingly," Arkeilpane said.

It offers a chance as well "to pound our chests a little bit" about the good things that have been happening in the program, he said.

This process of self-study will run through the end of the summer and into the early Fall 2002, he said, with an evaluation of the program being submitted to an outside peer-review team in the fall. That team will come to campus in November to corroborate what is in the report, he added.

"It's a very open process," he said of the certification process, noting that if he had not been invited to attend this FSEC meeting, he would have approached the group himself to brief it on the certification process.

Arkeilpane also noted there is a page on the Division of Athletics Web site, www.ubathletics.buffalo.edu/certification/, that offers details on the process. "We will continue to update the campus community on the progress of the entire effort," he said.

In his presentation to the FSEC, Arkeilpane also addressed a recent story published in USA Today, which was picked up by other media outlets, about possible changes in legislation governing the makeup of Division I-A.

He said that the NCAA is looking at imposing six more criteria that schools would have to meet to maintain status at the Division I-A level.

"I'm happy to report that in five of the six areas, we are very, very strong," he said.

Among those proposed criteria, Arkeilpane said UB comes in above the likely requirements in the number of sports sponsored—UB has 20, NCAA wants 16; in the number of grants-in-aid awarded across the program, and in the number of games against I-A-level opponents scheduled in UB stadium—UB has four through its membership in the Mid-American Conference, and will have the required five when it brings in such schools as Syracuse, Temple, Rutgers and Connecticut in the coming years.

One area in question is attendance, he said. The NCAA may require an average attendance of 15,000. After three games this year, UB is averaging more than that, but attendance likely will slide once the cold weather sets in this month, he noted.

"But we are not far off the mark we have to be on," he said, adding that more effort will be put into marketing the team.

"The bottom line is that these criteria that are being proposed will inevitably look different by the time it's passed"—at the earliest by 2004—and "we're in pretty good shape right now as an institution at meeting these particular criteria."

Also as part of the athletics presentation, Edward Michael, director of recreation and intramurals, briefed senators on the various programs offered by the department.

He also put in a plug for a stand-alone recreation facility that is being considered as part of the Lee Road project.

Michael pointed out that many of UB's peer institutions have such a facility, which would help in the recruitment and retention of both students and faculty and staff.

 

Front Page | Top Stories | Briefly | Electronic Highways | Kudos
Mail | Obituaries | Photos | Q&A | Sports | Exhibits, Notices, Jobs
Events | Current Issue | Comments? | Archives
Search | UB Home | UB News Services | UB Today